Glass Scraps Accumulating Fast
#1
Posted 07 February 2010 - 05:36 AM
I'm just beginning but I'm already noticing how quickly glass scraps accumulate. For now I am sorting them into boxes by size - big, medium, and small. Is there any point in keeping the ones less than an inch in diameter? Do you save them up for some future projects like mosaics or do you learn to let them go without regret?
#2
Posted 07 February 2010 - 08:06 AM
#3
Posted 07 February 2010 - 12:52 PM
That applies only to art glass (for stained glass). The compatible glass for fusing is different. We use EVERYTHING all the way down to the powder. Although fusing glass initially costs more per sq ft then art glass, because there's no waste it ends up costing less.
#5
Posted 07 February 2010 - 04:05 PM
Dawnt, on 07 February 2010 - 03:04 PM, said:
I bought a quantity of stacking plastic vegetable bins to keep scraps sorted. Not only do I manage to use up all of the scraps, I now do so much casting I buy pallet loads of Spectrum Systems 96 cullet in 5 gal pails.
I predict kiln casting glass will be one of the fastest growing glass art interests over the next few years. I'm sufficiently convinced of this, I've made a significant investment to produce a variety of molds for that purpose.
#7
Posted 08 February 2010 - 11:00 AM
Chantal, on 08 February 2010 - 08:54 AM, said:
I poured glass scraps into it until I couldn't stuff anymore, put in more dirt, and covered it with big rocks.
Hey Dennis, what we need is a "beach glass making machine." AKA a rock tumbler
A while back I had a lady come into the shop asking to buy "authentic beach glass" but only wanted it in bags of red, blue, and purple. I told there was no such thing but suggested I could make her tumbled glass in whatever colours she wanted. Her response, "I'm a true artist and won't use "made" glass but use only authentic glass collected on a beach".
I did manage to find the strength to not tell her what I thought of "true artists" that made stuff with beach glass and for some strangely deluded reason thought there might be someone somewhere that patrolled beaches collecting glass and sorting it by colour to sell.
However ..... it did provide another reason (to an already lengthy list) to why I hate the word "artist".
#8
Posted 08 February 2010 - 07:25 PM
Dennis Brady, on 08 February 2010 - 11:00 AM, said:
I did manage to find the strength to not tell her what I thought of "true artists" that made stuff with beach glass and for some strangely deluded reason thought there might be someone somewhere that patrolled beaches collecting glass and sorting it by colour to sell.
However ..... it did provide another reason (to an already lengthy list) to why I hate the word "artist".
Now, that made me laugh out loud at the computer... I'm sure you were biting your tongue...
#9
Posted 08 February 2010 - 08:37 PM
cdngardener, on 08 February 2010 - 07:25 PM, said:
I have a friend that teaches Art as a Business at a fine arts college that likes to start his class with the statement:
"Artist is a gift word. It can be given but not taken. If you call someone an artist, you're praising the quality of their work. If you call yourself an artist, you're masturbating your ego".
That's too long-winded for me. I prefer:
"Artist is a self-granted designation to explain why your work won't sell".
#10
Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:42 PM
#11
Posted 09 February 2010 - 12:08 AM
Chantal, on 08 February 2010 - 08:54 AM, said:
I poured glass scraps into it until I couldn't stuff anymore, put in more dirt, and covered it with big rocks.
Hey Dennis, what we need is a "beach glass making machine." AKA a rock tumbler
Rock tumbler is too slow and too small. A small cement mixer would work just fine, loaded with gravel and scrap glass.
#12
Posted 09 February 2010 - 12:52 AM
Dennis Brady, on 08 February 2010 - 08:37 PM, said:
"Artist is a gift word. It can be given but not taken. If you call someone an artist, you're praising the quality of their work. If you call yourself an artist, you're masturbating your ego".
That's too long-winded for me. I prefer:
"Artist is a self-granted designation to explain why your work won't sell".
The same thing could be said about some Teachers, Craftsmen and Artisans, when you think about it. Actually, that could be true for any Trade where one self awards a "Title" that implies claims of "Mastery" of said Trade, without qualified , unbiased, and verification and documentation.
#13
Posted 10 February 2010 - 09:09 PM
Neptunia, on 07 February 2010 - 04:36 AM, said:
I'm just beginning but I'm already noticing how quickly glass scraps accumulate. For now I am sorting them into boxes by size - big, medium, and small. Is there any point in keeping the ones less than an inch in diameter? Do you save them up for some future projects like mosaics or do you learn to let them go without regret?
I save my scrap glass for mosaics. I realize however you can not save everything---- but I try.
#14
Posted 10 February 2010 - 10:36 PM
happy1, on 10 February 2010 - 09:09 PM, said:
I guess I am like a lot of others and scrap glass builds up. Doing mostly lamp shade panels, anything under 10 to 12 inches qualifies as scrap. Besides, its a lot easier and faster to just get a new piece when you need it, instead of riffling through scrap, for the right color, shade, and texture. I always bill out a full square foot, regardless of how much I actually use of it, so its paid for anyway.The glass I use, mostly caramel, green, and white opals, has to match what is already in the shades, and there is such a variety of criteria it has to meet, that its almost impossible to have every piece you will ever need. For example, if you need to match a piece of caramel and white opal, it has to be the right shade of caramel, which can be one of six or so shades, the right shade of white, which can also be several choices, the right amount of white vs. caramel, the right pattern of the streaks and designs, and the right backing, which can be smooth, granite, cats paw, or anything else. Its easier to buy as you need it, and you have to pick it out yourself. I can keep 3 or 4 of the most common combinations, in smooth and granite backed, which will take care of maybe 75% of what I need, in each color, but I can not keep it all. As it is, I still have more glass and supplies on hand, than any "Hobby" shop should have, for one person. Such is life...for a "Packrat"
#15
Posted 11 February 2010 - 10:39 AM
However, I have grown up and overcome my OCD (to a point). I now have a small box for 96 COE and a small box for 90 COE and otherwise, under 4"-6" is history. It was difficult and I believe I may have shed a tear or two the first time I threw away a piece bigger than 2"x2" and yes, I almost retrieved it from the garbage (really that one small piece would be perfect down the road as a center of a tiny flower or the eye of a dragon--if I remembered that I had it saved of course).
Now I enjoy not having to step over and around all the boxes. Besides, not having a small piece gives me the opportunity to run down to my local shop and ooo and ahhh a bit.
#16
Posted 11 February 2010 - 03:37 PM
#17
Posted 11 February 2010 - 09:40 PM
Spotteddot, on 11 February 2010 - 12:37 PM, said:
Yes, garbageman also don't like sharp surprises when they heft your bag. I've never sold scrap, but I've bought it and always made more from it than I paid. I've never minded doing small stuff --prefer it in some ways, especially if I have a few boxes of scraps to rummage through to find the best combinations. When I bought sheets for bigger projects, I'd try to get something I knew would work well for ornaments. It does pile up though, and nowadays I save with a few specific items in mind rather than keep anything and everything; the other thing I finally did was to build a rack of big shallow drawers, like the kind they call "specimen" drawers. No point in having the stuff if you can't see it fairly easily: when it piles up too high, I start thinning it out.
#18
Posted 11 February 2010 - 10:49 PM
Fox, on 11 February 2010 - 09:40 PM, said:
I thought about seperating primary colors, like greens yellows, blues, reds, and such and then loading a crucible full of one color, and melting it to a pouring state, and pouring them in molds to make Turtle back, medallions, tiles, and slabs. Was not sure how the COE would play into that, or if at the liquid state, it would even be an issue. Maybe Dennis could answer that one. Sure would be a good way to get rid of scraps. The slabs and Tiles would be great in a garden setting too.
#19
Posted 12 February 2010 - 06:27 PM
Boris_USA, on 11 February 2010 - 10:49 PM, said:
Dennis can't answer. All his experiments with melting art glass were such consistent failures, he's no longer willing to waste any more time on futile efforts. It's like throwing a ball into the air in the hope that enough attempts will eventually get it to stay up and not fall back down.
#20
Posted 12 February 2010 - 08:52 PM
Dennis Brady, on 12 February 2010 - 06:27 PM, said:
Ask Dennis if he melted any of the experiments to a liquid pourable state and tried casting with it...

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote

